From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 15, 2016
No. 2:12-cv-3045 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-3045 MCE AC P

01-15-2016

DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed November 17, 2015, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant. ECF No. 52. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within thirty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." //// //// Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: January 15, 2016

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. State

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 15, 2016
No. 2:12-cv-3045 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 15, 2016

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-3045 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2016)