From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-1105 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-1105 CKD P

08-07-2013

DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed June 13, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court assign a district judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

____________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-1105 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Brown v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:DEXTER BROWN, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-1105 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2013)