From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 2, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1075 MLB (D. Kan. Jan. 2, 2008)

Opinion

ACTION No. 07-1075 MLB.

January 2, 2008


ORDER


Ten days having passed, and no written objections being filed to the proposed findings and recommendations filed by the magistrate judge John Thomas Reid, and after a de novo determination upon the record pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 72(b), the court accepts the recommended decision and adopts it as its own.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Jan 2, 2008
ACTION No. 07-1075 MLB (D. Kan. Jan. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP BROWN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Jan 2, 2008

Citations

ACTION No. 07-1075 MLB (D. Kan. Jan. 2, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lowe v. Colvin

Thus, SSR 83-20 is not applicable in this case, unless on remand, the ALJ makes a finding that plaintiff was…

Lane v. Astrue

Thus, SSR 83-20 is not applicable in this case. Brown v. Astrue, Case No. 07-1075-MLB, 2008 WL 90070 at *3…