From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Ariz. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 22, 2018
No. CV-17-04298-PHX-DKD (D. Ariz. Feb. 22, 2018)

Opinion

No. CV-17-04298-PHX-DKD

02-22-2018

Deborah H. Brown, Plaintiff, v. Arizona Department of Corrections, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff's Complaint, (Doc. 1), Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, (Doc. 2), and United States Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), which recommends dismissal of the Complaint without prejudice, (Doc. 12). The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff that she had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 2 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, 6(a), 6(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).

Plaintiff did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.").

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Duncan's R&R (Doc. 12) is ACCEPTED and Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Application for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied as moot.

Dated this 22nd day of February, 2018.

/s/_________

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brown v. Ariz. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 22, 2018
No. CV-17-04298-PHX-DKD (D. Ariz. Feb. 22, 2018)
Case details for

Brown v. Ariz. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Deborah H. Brown, Plaintiff, v. Arizona Department of Corrections…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Feb 22, 2018

Citations

No. CV-17-04298-PHX-DKD (D. Ariz. Feb. 22, 2018)