From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington)
Nov 24, 2020
Civil Action No. 5: 20-448-DCR (E.D. Ky. Nov. 24, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5: 20-448-DCR

11-24-2020

KENNETH WILBERT BROWN, Petitioner, v. BRAD ADAMS, Warden, et al., Respondents.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

*** *** *** ***

Petitioner Kenneth Brown is confined at the Northpoint Training Center in Burgin, Kentucky. He has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon initial review of the petition, United States Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins observed that Brown seeks to challenge convictions entered by the Jefferson County Circuit Court, which lies within the Western District of Kentucky.

Joint Local Rule of Civil Practice 3.2(b) provides that a "state habeas corpus petition shall be assigned to the jury division that includes the court . . . in which the challenged judgment, conviction or order was rendered." The Magistrate Judge also noted that witnesses and records are more likely to be located in the Western District of Kentucky, making it the more appropriate forum. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Seventeen days have passed since entry of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation indicating that this matter should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky; the parties have failed to object.

Although this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's recommendations to which timely objections are made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Record No. 6] is ADOPTED and INCORPORATED in full.

2. The petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Record No. 4] is DENIED, as moot, because he tendered the $5.00 filing fee on November 13, 2020.

3. This matter is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky for further proceedings.

4. The matter is STRICKEN from this Court's docket.

Dated: November 24, 2020.

Danny C. Reeves, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Eastern District of Kentucky


Summaries of

Brown v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington)
Nov 24, 2020
Civil Action No. 5: 20-448-DCR (E.D. Ky. Nov. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Brown v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH WILBERT BROWN, Petitioner, v. BRAD ADAMS, Warden, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington)

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 5: 20-448-DCR (E.D. Ky. Nov. 24, 2020)