From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown Lab Invs. v. Moesser

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jul 21, 2022
No. 01-21-00668-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2022)

Opinion

01-21-00668-CV

07-21-2022

Brown Lab Investments, LLC, Joel Katz and Andrea Katz v. Lane Moesser


190th District Court of Harris County Trial court case number: 2016-35154

ORDER

Sherry Radack Judge

Appellee has filed an unopposed motion to supplement volume 22 of the reporter's record with portions of an omitted transcript from a March 5, 2021 arbitration hearing. Appellee relies on Rule 34.6(e) to permit the supplementation without the court reporter's certification because volume 22 is inaccurate. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(e).

Because appellee seeks to supplement the reporter's record with omitted materials, appellee must follow Rule 34.6(d), which states, "If anything relevant is omitted from the reporter's record . . . the appellate court, or any party may by letter direct the official court reporter to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplemental reporter's record containing the omitted items." Tex.R.App.P. 34.6(d). Accordingly, we denyappellee's motion. Appellee may request the court reporter to file the supplemental reporter's record in compliance with Rule 34.6(d).

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown Lab Invs. v. Moesser

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jul 21, 2022
No. 01-21-00668-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Brown Lab Invs. v. Moesser

Case Details

Full title:Brown Lab Investments, LLC, Joel Katz and Andrea Katz v. Lane Moesser

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Jul 21, 2022

Citations

No. 01-21-00668-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 21, 2022)