From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broussard v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
1:12-cv-01040-MJS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)

Opinion

1:12-cv-01040-MJS (HC)

02-19-2013

CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, JR., Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING


(Doc. 81)


THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 15, 2013, Respondent filed a motion to extend time to file a responsive pleading. Good cause having been presented to the Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Respondent is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file a responsive pleading. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Michael J. Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Broussard v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 19, 2013
1:12-cv-01040-MJS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Broussard v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:CURLEY JOHN BROUSSARD, JR., Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

1:12-cv-01040-MJS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 19, 2013)