From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brouk v. Granite Gaming Croup I, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2013
2:11-cv-01930-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

2:11-cv-01930-PMP-VCF

02-27-2013

CALEB BROUK, Plaintiff, v. GRANITE GAMING CROUP I, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Having considered the arguments of counsel presented at the hearing conducted February 25, 2013, on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #25), Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #28), and Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. #46), and finding that genuine issues of material fact remain with respect to each of the issues identified in Plaintiff and Defendants' Crossmotions for Summary Judgement, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #25) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. #28) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. #46) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties to this action shall forthwith meet and confer and shall thereafter file a Joint Pretrial Order on or before March 27, 2013.

______________

PHILIP M. PRO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brouk v. Granite Gaming Croup I, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2013
2:11-cv-01930-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Brouk v. Granite Gaming Croup I, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CALEB BROUK, Plaintiff, v. GRANITE GAMING CROUP I, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

2:11-cv-01930-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2013)