From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brophy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 21, 2000.

December 19, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered October 14, 1999, as denied, as premature, their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Geeta Chowdhary, and for summary judgment dismissing the first, third, and fourth causes of action insofar as asserted against the defendants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetraHealth Insurance Company.

Moran d'Arcambal, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (Siobhan E. Moran and Aimee P. Levine of counsel), for appellants.

Joel Martin Aurnou, White Plains, N.Y. (Kieran James Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied, as premature, the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground that the defendants failed to comply with court-ordered discovery (see, Hill v. Douglas Elliman-Gibbons Ives, 269 A.D.2d 117; Esposito v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 264 A.D.2d 370; Colicchio v. Port Auth. of N.Y. N.J., 246 A.D.2d 464; Lewis v. Agency Rent-A-Car, 168 A.D.2d 435).


Summaries of

Brophy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Brophy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BROPHY, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 616

Citing Cases

Sbasching v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

The defendant failed to appropriately respond to a discovery order by submitting information from a person…

Finnegan v. Ulrich

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, so much of the order…