From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
Case No. 1:09-cv-922 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-922

03-14-2013

ULIOUS BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. HOMER YATES, et al., Defendants.


Bowman, J.


AMENDED CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL ORDER

On February 26, 2013, all parties participated in a telephonic status conference at which they affirmed their agreement on all material terms of a settlement of this litigation. Pursuant to that agreement, the Court previously entered a conditional dismissal order reflecting dismissal with prejudice, but that any party may "upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated." (Doc. 160, emphasis original). Counsel for Defendants having requested an extension of the thirty-day period, and consistent with the discussion at the Court's prior status conference, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Conditional Dismissal Order previously filed (Doc. 160) is hereby amended as stated herein;

2. This action shall remain DISMISSED with prejudice, except that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown, move to reopen the action on or before May 26, 2013 if settlement is not consummated;

3. The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties.

_______________

Stephanie K. Bowman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Brooks v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2013
Case No. 1:09-cv-922 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Brooks v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:ULIOUS BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. HOMER YATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-922 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2013)