From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2013
Case No. 1:09-cv-922 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-922

02-26-2013

ULIOUS BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. HOMER YATES, et al., Defendants.


Bowman, M.J.


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

The parties having reached an agreement on all material terms of a settlement of this litigation in the presence of the Court, by telephone, on February 26, 2013;

It is ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within thirty (30) days, move to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

The Court expressly and explicitly retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

Stephanie K. Bowman

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Brooks v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 26, 2013
Case No. 1:09-cv-922 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Brooks v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:ULIOUS BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. HOMER YATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-922 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2013)