From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Oct 26, 2010
5:10CV159-1-V, 5:08CR48-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2010)

Opinion

5:10CV159-1-V, 5:08CR48-V.

October 26, 2010


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court for an initial review of Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. No. 1), filed October 22, 2010.

In her Motion to Vacate, Petitioner claims, among other things, that after sentencing she specifically asked her counsel to file a direct appeal. (Doc. No. 1.) Petitioner further states that her counsel informed her that her chances of prevailing were slim and he ultimately failed to file the appeal. (Doc. No. 1.)

An attorney's failure to file a notice of appeal, when requested by his client to do so, is per se ineffective assistance of counsel. Prejudice to the defendant is presumed irrespective of the merits of the appeal or a waiver of appellate rights. Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 391-405 (1985); United States v. Poindexter, 492 F.3d 263, 273 (4th Cir. 2007); United States v. Peak, 992 F.2d 39 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, on a showing that counsel was requested to appeal but failed to do so, the prescribed remedy is to vacate the original judgment and enter a new judgment from which an appeal can be taken. Peak, 992 F.2d at 42.

Regardless of how Respondent responds to Petitioner's allegation, at a minimum a factual dispute will exist over whether or not Petitioner requested her counsel to file a direct appeal. Consequently, in accordance with this Court's practices, the Court will vacate the original judgment and direct the Clerk to enter a new identical judgment from which an appeal can be taken.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate is GRANTED in part;
2. All of Petitioner's claims except for her ineffective assistance of counsel claim based upon her attorney's failure to file an appeal are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3. Petitioner's criminal judgment is vacated due to her attorney's failure to file a direct appeal;
4. The Clerk is directed to prepare a new criminal judgment with the same sentence and conditions; and
5. The Clerk is directed to file a notice of appeal on Petitioner's behalf.

Signed: October 26, 2010

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

DECISION BY COURT. This action having come before the Court by motion and a decision having been rendered;

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's October 26, 2010 Order.

Signed: October 26, 2010


Summaries of

Brooks v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division
Oct 26, 2010
5:10CV159-1-V, 5:08CR48-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Brooks v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ROSE MARY BROOKS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Statesville Division

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

5:10CV159-1-V, 5:08CR48-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2010)