Brooks v. Taylor County

2 Citing cases

  1. Cervantez v. Love

    1:22-CV-150-H (N.D. Tex. Jun. 12, 2024)   Cited 1 times

    “This exception has been applied in cases where the severity of the risk or injury is obvious or the cause of that injury or harm is plainly evident to the officer.” Brooks v. Taylor County, No. 1:20-CV-049-H, 2021 WL 3039016, at *5 (N.D. Tex. July 19, 2021).

  2. Jones v. Gammage

    Civil Action 4:20-CV-220-SA-JMV (N.D. Miss. Feb. 28, 2022)   Cited 1 times
    Granting leave to amend where additional factual allegations would “provide clarity as to the specific factual allegations and theories upon which the [p]laintiffs rel[ied]” and “allow the [c]ourt to analyze the qualified immunity defenses more thoroughly”

    “In deciding whether to grant leave to amend, the Court may consider factors ‘such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue 3 of allowance of the amendment, and futility of the amendment.'” Brooks v. Taylor Cnty., Tex., 2021 WL 3039016, at *7 (N.D. Tex. July 19, 2021) (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9 L.Ed.2d 222 (1962)). “Courts may also consider judicial efficiency and effective case management.”