From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 14, 1991
578 So. 2d 907 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2909.

May 14, 1991.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Phillip S. Davis, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Avi Litwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.


The state having confessed error in the trial court imposing an upward departure sentence upon a parole violation, the sentence be and the same is hereby vacated, and the matter is returned to the trial court for sentencing within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1990); Hamilton v. State, 548 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1989).

Reversed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 14, 1991
578 So. 2d 907 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID D. BROOKS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 14, 1991

Citations

578 So. 2d 907 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

State v. Hayes (May 24, 2000), 9th Dist. No. 99CA007416. "Courts have interpreted [Crim.R. 32] as imposing `a…

State v. Smith

{¶ 5} Ohio courts have further interpreted these requirements as imposing "`a mandatory duty [on the trial…