From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 14, 2000
762 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 5D00-1372

Opinion Filed July 14, 2000 JULY TERM 2000

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Kenneth R. Lester, Jr., Judge.

Walter Lee Brooks, Madison, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Pursuant to a 3.800 motion, Brooks challenged his sentence as a violent career criminal under the 1995 statute which has been declared unconstitutional. The trial court denied the motion on the basis that Brooks did not have standing, relying on Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). In Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667, 2000 WL 5816965 (Fla. May 11, 2000), the supreme court held that the window period for challenging the violent career criminal statute begins on October 1, 1995 and ends on May 24, 1997. Brooks committed his offenses on October 15, 1996; therefore he has standing to challenge his sentence. The order denying Brooks' 3.800 motion is reversed and the cause is remanded for consideration of sentencing in light of the supreme court decision in Salters.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 14, 2000
762 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:WALTER LEE BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 14, 2000

Citations

762 So. 2d 578 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)