Opinion
No. 05-04-01406-CR
Opinion Filed April 25, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-20298-QN. Affirmed.
Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Albert Douglas Brooks, Jr. appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child. After the jury found appellant guilty, it assessed punishment at sixty years' confinement. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.