From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 16, 2015
No. 10-13-00409-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 10-13-00409-CR

04-16-2015

ADAM LAMAR BROOKS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


From the County Court at Law No. 1 Brazos County, Texas
Trial Court No. 11-01734-CRM-CCL1

ORDER

Adam Lamar Brooks was convicted of indecent exposure and sentenced to 120 days in jail with a $1,000 fine. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.08 (West 2011). Brooks filed a motion to suppress his statements in which he generally contended he did not voluntarily make any statements to police. After two hearings, the motion to suppress was denied. Brooks requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, but none were made.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has said, "Under article 38.22 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, '[i]n all cases where a question is raised as to the voluntariness of a statement of an accused, the [trial] court ... must enter an order stating its conclusion as to whether or not the statement was voluntarily made, along with the specific finding of fact upon which the conclusion was based, which order shall be filed among the papers of this cause.'" Vasquez v. State, 411 S.W.3d 918, 920 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (quoting art. 38.22, sec. 6). In Vasquez, the Court held that "written findings are required in all cases concerning voluntariness. The statute has no exceptions." Id.

We abated this proceeding once to obtain the required findings of fact and conclusions of law. We received findings and conclusions from the trial court judge who heard the pre-trial motion to suppress. However, the motion to suppress was relitigated at trial before a visiting trial court judge.

Accordingly, this appeal is abated to the trial court so that the visiting trial court judge, the Honorable Terry Flenniken, can make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether Brooks' statements were voluntary. These additional findings of fact and conclusions of law must be prepared, signed, and filed as a supplemental clerk's record with this Court within 28 days from the date of this Order.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Appeal abated
Order issued and filed April 16, 2015


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 16, 2015
No. 10-13-00409-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:ADAM LAMAR BROOKS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

No. 10-13-00409-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 16, 2015)