From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 23, 2023
2:22-CV-0062-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CV-0062-DMC-P

01-23-2023

WILLIE LEE BROOKS, II, Plaintiff, v. RAINELLE SMITH, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 50, to withdraw his first amended complaint. Good cause appearing therefor, Plaintiff's motion is granted. Plaintiff's first amended complaint at ECF No. 36 is stricken. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's original complaint, ECF No. 1, which Defendant has answered, ECF No. 30. Pursuant to the Court's December 12, 2022, order, Defendant may file an early motion for summary judgment based on exhaustion within 60 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 23, 2023
2:22-CV-0062-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Brooks v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE LEE BROOKS, II, Plaintiff, v. RAINELLE SMITH, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 23, 2023

Citations

2:22-CV-0062-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2023)