From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Newton-Embry

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 3, 2010
Case No. CIV-10-0035-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 3, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-10-0035-F.

February 3, 2010


ORDER


This action is brought by petitioner, a state prisoner appearing pro se, for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 19, 2010, Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. The Report advised petitioner that failure to timely object to the Report waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal issues contained in the Report. Petitioner has not responded to the Report and has not asked for an extension of time within which to respond. With no objection having been filed, the court, after review, hereby ADOPTS, ACCEPTS and AFFIRMS the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Couch. Accordingly, this action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma for all further proceedings.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Newton-Embry

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Feb 3, 2010
Case No. CIV-10-0035-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Brooks v. Newton-Embry

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY RENEE BROOKS, Petitioner, v. MILLICENT NEWTON-EMBRY, WARDEN, and…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-10-0035-F (W.D. Okla. Feb. 3, 2010)