Opinion
May Term, 1903.
Plaintiff's exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the question of defendant's negligence was one of fact for the jury. All concurred.
May Term, 1903.
Plaintiff's exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the question of defendant's negligence was one of fact for the jury. All concurred.
Full title:Sarah Brooks, Plaintiff, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1903