Opinion
May Term, 1903.
Plaintiff's exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide event. Held, that the question of defendant's negligence was one of fact for the jury. All concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Brooks v. New York Central and Hudson Riv. R.R. Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1903
84 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Summaries of
Brooks v. New York Central and Hudson Riv. R.R. Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1903
84 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Case details for
Brooks v. New York Central and Hudson Riv. R.R. Co.
Case Details
Full title:Sarah Brooks, Plaintiff, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1903
Citations
84 App. Div. 633 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)