From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Miami Valley Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 11, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-318 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-318

06-11-2013

MARK BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #39), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. #30) is DENIED and this case remains TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

______________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brooks v. Miami Valley Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 11, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-318 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Brooks v. Miami Valley Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:MARK BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jun 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-318 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 11, 2013)