From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Menifee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. CV07-0131-A (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. CV07-0131-A

10-26-2011

LOVE ALTONIO BROOKS, Plaintiff v. WARDEN FREDRICK MENIFEE, et al., Defendants


JUDGE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment on the issue of timeliness is DENIED.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at ____, Louisiana, on this day 26th day of October, 2010.

____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooks v. Menifee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. CV07-0131-A (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Brooks v. Menifee

Case Details

Full title:LOVE ALTONIO BROOKS, Plaintiff v. WARDEN FREDRICK MENIFEE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. CV07-0131-A (W.D. La. Oct. 26, 2011)

Citing Cases

Donahue v. Strain

Griffith v. City of New Orleans, No. 11-245, 2013 WL 5592937, at *3 (E.D. La. Oct. 10, 2013) (citing Hunter…