From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 17, 2009
Case No. 3:09cv475/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09cv475/RV/EMT.

November 17, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a supporting memorandum (Docs. 1, 2). The filing fee has been paid.

The court notes that Petitioner failed to file his petition on the court-approved form for use in section 2254 cases. Local Rule 5.1(J) for the Northern District of Florida states that the court will not accept for consideration an application for writ of habeas corpus under section 2254 unless the appropriate petition form is properly completed and filed. Thus, Petitioner must file an amended petition on the form for use in section 2254 cases. Petitioner is advised that the amended petition must contain all of his allegations, and it should not in any way refer to the original pleading. The amended petition completely replaces all previous petitions; when an amended petition is filed, all earlier petitions are disregarded. Local Rule 15.1, Northern District of Florida.

Furthermore, Petitioner must submit a complete copy of the amended petition for each named Respondent and for the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Therefore, Petitioner must submit two (2) complete copies of the amended petition, as well as the supporting memorandum (Doc. 2).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to send to Petitioner a copy of the form for use in Section 2254 cases. This case number should be written on the form.

2. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Petitioner shall file an amended habeas petition, which shall be typed or clearly written, submitted on the court form, and marked "Amended Petition." Additionally, Petitioner shall provide two (2) service copies of the amended petition and two (2) service copies of his supporting memorandum (Doc. 2).

3. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brooks v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Nov 17, 2009
Case No. 3:09cv475/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Brooks v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:LEROY BROOKS, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09cv475/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Nov. 17, 2009)