Brooks v. King

Full title: MARLOWE NATHANIEL BROOKS, Petitioner, v. JOHN KING, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 3, 2009

Civil No. 09-1388 ADM/AJB (D. Minn. Nov. 3, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-1388 ADM/AJB.

November 3, 2009

ORDER

ANN MONTGOMERY, District Judge

Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated September 9, 2009, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Recommendation¹,

1 By Order of October 1, 2009, [Docket No. 11] the Court extended Petitioner's time to file objections from September 23, 2009, to October 15, 2009. No objections have been filed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, (Docket No. 1), is DENIED; and

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.