From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Eichstaedt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 18, 2021
Case No. 3:19-cv-00515 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 3:19-cv-00515

03-18-2021

CHRISTOPHER BROOKS Plaintiff(s) v. EICHSTAEDT, et al., Defendant(s)


Judge Richardson /Frensley REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Three services packets were issued to the Plaintiff on September 5, 2019. Docket No. 7. As of the date of the filing of this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has failed to return the packets. Plaintiff has had ample opportunity to prosecute this case, yet has made no attempts to even achieve service of the defendants. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed.

Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has fourteen (14) days after service of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to the Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have fourteen (14) days after service of any objections filed to this Report in which to file any response to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within fourteen (14) days of service of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985), reh'g denied,474 U.S. 111 (1986); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.

/s/_________

JEFFERY S. FRENSLEY

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Brooks v. Eichstaedt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Mar 18, 2021
Case No. 3:19-cv-00515 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Brooks v. Eichstaedt

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BROOKS Plaintiff(s) v. EICHSTAEDT, et al., Defendant(s)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2021

Citations

Case No. 3:19-cv-00515 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2021)