From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 23, 2023
2:22-cv-1967 DAD CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1967 DAD CKD P

08-23-2023

ARTHUR BROOKS, JR., Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 6, 2023, the court issued findings and recommendations to dismiss plaintiff's case without prejudice based on his failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided. In objections docketed on August 14, 2023, plaintiff indicates that he has been housed in a mental health crisis bed and thus unable to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 13. The court will construe plaintiff's objections as a motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. So construed, the motion will be granted. The court vacates the Findings and Recommendations issued on July 6, 2023 and grants plaintiff 45 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 13) are construed as a motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint. So construed, the motion is granted for good cause shown.

2. Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date of this order to file a first amended complaint.

3. The findings and recommendations filed July 6, 2023, are hereby vacated.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 23, 2023
2:22-cv-1967 DAD CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Brooks v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR BROOKS, JR., Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 23, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1967 DAD CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2023)