From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. County of Onondaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J. We add only that the amendment to article XIII, § 13 (a) of the NY Constitution, which, effective January 1, 1990, deleted therefrom the sentence "But the county shall never be made responsible for the acts of the sheriff", should not be given retroactive effect. It is the general rule of construction that "constitutional provisions are to be construed as prospective only, unless a clear expression of intent to the contrary is found" (Matter of Ayman v. Teachers' Retirement Bd., 9 N.Y.2d 119, 125). Here, there is no indication in the legislative history of the amendment or in the amendment itself indicating that the amendment should be retroactively applied.


Summaries of

Brooks v. County of Onondaga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Brooks v. County of Onondaga

Case Details

Full title:CODY BROOKS, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of ANTHONY R…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 862 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 260

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

As amended and charged to the jury, the indictment alleged with respect to the second incident that defendant…

People v. Burdo

"In any event, the fact that a sentence imposed after trial is longer than one offered in plea negotiations…