From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Brooks

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 15, 1932
146 Misc. 335 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)

Opinion

December 15, 1932.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, Fifth District.

Kreutzer Slack [ Meyer H. Slack of counsel], for the appellant.

Hays, St. John, Abramson Schulman [ Alan S. Hays of counsel], for the respondent.


Final order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellant. It is conceded that defendant's original entry upon the premises was lawful, and, therefore, she was not an intruder or a squatter within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (6 Wait N.Y. Prac. [3d ed.] 300, and cases cited; Matter of Stockwell v. Washburn, 59 Misc. 543; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 id. 367; Williams v. Alt, 186 A.D. 235; affd., 226 N.Y. 283.)

All concur; present, MacCRATE, LEWIS and JOHNSTON, JJ.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Brooks

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 15, 1932
146 Misc. 335 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
Case details for

Brooks v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIPS BROOKS, Landlord, Respondent, v. GRACE A. BROOKS, Tenant…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1932

Citations

146 Misc. 335 (N.Y. App. Term 1932)
261 N.Y.S. 211

Citing Cases

Wright v. Wright

Where it appears, as in the instant case, that the respondent's original entry upon the property was lawful,…

Tausik v. Tausik

The question is whether a husband may evict his wife by summary proceedings from a matrimonial domicile, when…