From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brookins v. Acosta

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 2, 2023
1:19-cv-00401 -JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2023)

Opinion

1:19-cv-00401 -JLT-HBK (PC)

02-02-2023

BARRY L. BROOKINS, Plaintiff, v. F. ACOSTA, Defendant.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S INMATE STATEMENT REPORT (Doc. No. 47)

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On January 31, 2023, Plaintiff filed a copy of his CDCR Inmate Statement Report. (Doc. No. 47, Statement). No request for relief accompanies the Statement. The Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on April 8, 2019. (Doc. No. 6). “A request for a court order must be made by motion.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b)(1). A party must “state with particularity the grounds for seeking the order; and state the relief sought.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(b(1)(B),(C). The Court cannot discern for what purpose Plaintiff filed the Statement. Because the filing fails to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure it will be stricken.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The Clerk of Court is directed to strike Plaintiff's Statement (Doc. No. 47).


Summaries of

Brookins v. Acosta

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 2, 2023
1:19-cv-00401 -JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Brookins v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:BARRY L. BROOKINS, Plaintiff, v. F. ACOSTA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 2, 2023

Citations

1:19-cv-00401 -JLT-HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2023)