From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooke v. JHP Hosp. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 9, 2016
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01409 - AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2016)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01409 - AWI-JLT

12-09-2016

THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, v. JHP HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., dba Ramada Limited Bakersfield North, Defendant.


ORDER TO CLOSE THE CASE

On December 8, 2016, the plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal of the action. (Doc. 13) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 9 , 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooke v. JHP Hosp. Grp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 9, 2016
Case No.: 1:16-cv-01409 - AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Brooke v. JHP Hosp. Grp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, v. JHP HOSPITALITY GROUP, INC., dba Ramada…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 9, 2016

Citations

Case No.: 1:16-cv-01409 - AWI-JLT (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2016)