From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bronsert v. J.A. Cambece Law Office, PC

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 24, 2005
Case No. 5:05-cv-01826-JW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 5:05-cv-01826-JW.

December 24, 2005

Ronald Wilcox Esq., 176601, San Jose, Ca, Counsel for Plaintiff.


AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

Through discovery plaintiff has learned that a class action may not be appropriate in this matter. Thus, the parties have agreed to resolve this matter on an individual basis, with no prejudice to the potential class members. In light of the settlement reached between the parties as to all remaining issues pending before the Court, Josh Bronsert, Plaintiff, hereby moves the Court to dismiss this action with prejudice as to him and without prejudice as to the unnamed putative class members. Defendants, through their attorneys, have agreed to the granting of this motion.

Respectfully submitted this 16th day of December, 2005.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


On this day the Court considered Plaintiff's Agreed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. The Court finds that such motion should be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and without prejudice as to the rights of the putative class members. All relief not expressly granted in this order is denied.


Summaries of

Bronsert v. J.A. Cambece Law Office, PC

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 24, 2005
Case No. 5:05-cv-01826-JW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2005)
Case details for

Bronsert v. J.A. Cambece Law Office, PC

Case Details

Full title:Josh Bronsert, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Dec 24, 2005

Citations

Case No. 5:05-cv-01826-JW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2005)