From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bromley v. State

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Sep 23, 2008
Civil No. 08-cv-161-JL (D.N.H. Sep. 23, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-cv-161-JL.

September 23, 2008


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Petitioner has sued the State of Utah and several of its officers who have garnished his wages in New Hampshire, purportedly for child support. Petitioner alleges that he was denied due process and that the garnishment order was obtained without any notice or opportunity to be heard, all in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1673. He seeks a temporary restraining order.

It should be noted that petitioner filed a nearly identical action in this Court in 2006, seeking the same relief sought here and brought against the same defendants. See Bromley v. State of Utah, Civ. No. 06-cv-181-JD. That case was dismissed without prejudice when Bromley failed to prosecute the matter.

I recommend that the temporary restraining order be denied because at this point Bromley has neither shown irreparable injury nor certified in writing the efforts made to give notice of the injunctive request to the defendants or any reasons why notice should not be required. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b). I further recommend that a preliminary injunction hearing be set and that petitioner be ordered to serve his pleading, a copy of this report, and a copy of the scheduling order at least seven (7) days prior to the hearing. Because Bromley is proceeding in this matter in forma pauperis, he is entitled to have the United State's Marshal's office serve the defendants. Accordingly, I direct the Clerk's office to forward to the United States Marshal's office copies of this Report and Recommendation, the complaint (document no. 1), and the scheduling order for the preliminary injunction hearing, for service on the defendants.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(b) states, in relevant part, as follows:

[T]he court may issue a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice to the adverse party or its attorney only if: (A) specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition; and (B) the movant's attorney certifies in writing any efforts made to give notice and the reasons why it should not be required.

Any objections to this report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days of receipt of this notice. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the district court's order. See Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee v. Gordon, 979 F.2d 11, 13-14 (1st Cir. 1992);United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986).


Summaries of

Bromley v. State

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Sep 23, 2008
Civil No. 08-cv-161-JL (D.N.H. Sep. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Bromley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven L. Bromley v. State of Utah, et al

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Citations

Civil No. 08-cv-161-JL (D.N.H. Sep. 23, 2008)