From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broga v. Seelye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

April, 1930.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the return was conclusive as to the facts embodied therein; but we do not pass upon the question whether the defendant may have relief by an action in equity. ( Smith v. Lowry, 1 Johns. Ch. 320; Dobson v. Pearce, 12 N.Y. 156, 165; Weimer v. Guinnane, 125 Misc. 681; United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61.) All concur.


Summaries of

Broga v. Seelye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1930
229 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Broga v. Seelye

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT C. BROGA, Respondent, v. MILDRED SEELYE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1930

Citations

229 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Citing Cases

Van Orsdale v. Genesee Valley Garage, Inc.

The motion, therefore, to set aside the judgment entered November 4, 1933, by H. Frank Van Tyne, a justice of…

Matter of Rudgers

( O'Donoghue v. Boies, supra, p. 98.) We have not overlooked rulings by this court in East Syracuse Motor Car…