From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brodie v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 29, 2020
19 CIVIL 6968 (PAE)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 6968 (PAE)(RWL)

09-29-2020

LARRY THOMAS BRODIE, JR., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons set forth in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 28, 2020, after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report reveals that there is no facial error in its conclusions. The Report, which is incorporated by reference herein, is adopted without modification. Mr. Brodie's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied and the Commissioner's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

September 29, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Brodie v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 29, 2020
19 CIVIL 6968 (PAE)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Brodie v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:LARRY THOMAS BRODIE, JR., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 29, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 6968 (PAE)(RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2020)