From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broderick v. R.Y. Management Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2004
13 A.D.3d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4962N.

December 16, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered March 9, 2004, which denied defendants' motion to change the venue of this action from Bronx County to New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Williams, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.


There was insufficient evidence to substantiate defendants' contention that venue had been improperly placed in Bronx County. We note in particular that although William Condren, a general partner in defendant Grote Street Associates, averred that Grote Street's principal and only office was in New York County, there was no documentary evidence offered to confirm that assertion. Indeed, the documentary evidence adduced by plaintiffs, showing that Grote Street Associates maintained offices at two Bronx locations, read together with defendant's disingenuous attempt to explain away the contents of the first Condren affidavit, demonstrates that the IAS court properly denied defendants' motion.


Summaries of

Broderick v. R.Y. Management Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 16, 2004
13 A.D.3d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Broderick v. R.Y. Management Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEIRA M. BRODERICK, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, EDITH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 16, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 197 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 484

Citing Cases

Racquel Lividini, 20675/18E v. Goldstein

In any event, the plaintiff in that case relied on websites listing the location of the defendant's offices,…

Texas P. Ry. Co. v. Jones

Not so with the spike in this case. It was not an instrumentality furnished to appellee to use in tearing…