From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brock v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 1, 2010
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-1169, CRIM. NO. 2:90-CR-225 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 1, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-1169, CRIM. NO. 2:90-CR-225.

April 1, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


On January 26, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings recommending that this action be dismissed as barred by the one-year statute of limitations. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brock v. U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Apr 1, 2010
CASE NO. 2:09-CV-1169, CRIM. NO. 2:90-CR-225 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Brock v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND LEE BROCK, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 1, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-1169, CRIM. NO. 2:90-CR-225 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 1, 2010)