From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broadwater v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 14, 2017
Civil No. - JFM-17-1423 (D. Md. Jul. 14, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. - JFM-17-1423

07-14-2017

AMETHA CHERIE BROADWATER v. MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.


MEMORANDUM

Defendant has filed a motion to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The motion will be granted. Plaintiffs' choice of forum is, of course, entitled to great weight. However, here plaintiffs are residents of Bristol, Virginia. Moreover, plaintiffs' claims arose in Virginia, and potential witnesses include persons who conduct business in Virginia. Moreover, the case arises under Virginia law.

Plaintiffs' only contention in bringing the action in this district is that Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. is headquartered in Columbia, Maryland. Plaintiffs contend that Maxim's employees may have been trained in Maryland. However, Maxim has submitted the affidavit of Paula Adams stating that Karen Bird, R.N., who was primarily responsible for the treatment of plaintiffs' child, was trained, oriented and supervised at the Abingdon, Virginia office. Thus, the record belies plaintiffs' claim.

A separate order transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia in Abingdon is being entered herewith. Date: July 14, 2017

/s/_________

J. Frederick Motz

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Broadwater v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Jul 14, 2017
Civil No. - JFM-17-1423 (D. Md. Jul. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Broadwater v. Maxim Healthcare Servs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AMETHA CHERIE BROADWATER v. MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: Jul 14, 2017

Citations

Civil No. - JFM-17-1423 (D. Md. Jul. 14, 2017)