From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broadnax v. State

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 29, 2024
No. 24-CV-01465-JD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-01465-JD

04-29-2024

BROADNAX, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER RE DISMISSAL

Petitioner, a state prisoner acting pro se, filed a habeas petition. Petitioner was sent a notice that he had not paid the filing fee or submitted a Complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). He was provided twenty-eight days to Correct these deficiencies. More than twenty-eight days has passed, and petitioner has not paid the fee or filed a Complete application to proceed IFP. The Case is dismissed without prejudice. A Certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Broadnax v. State

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 29, 2024
No. 24-CV-01465-JD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Broadnax v. State

Case Details

Full title:BROADNAX, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-01465-JD (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2024)