From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broadie v. Fagent

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 31, 2008
Case No. 08-C-690 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 31, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 08-C-690.

October 31, 2008


ORDER


The plaintiff, Jesus Broadie, who is proceeding pro se, lodged a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that his civil rights were violated. His complaint was dismissed without prejudice and judgment was entered on September 18, 2008, after Broadie failed to submit a petition to proceed in forma pauperis and and accompanying affidavit or show cause why he was unable to do so in accordance with the Court's order of August 15, 2008. (Dkt. # 4.) Broadie has since continued to submit correspondence to the Court, much of which appears to complain about the conditions of his confinement at the Waupun Correctional Institution. In one such untitled filing of October 6, 2008, Broadie appears to request reconsideration of the dismissal of his case (Dkt. # 21 at 2.). Broadie presents a host of allegations regarding his treatment in confinement in this document, but did not address his failure to properly petition the Court to proceed in forma pauperis. In another submission he claimed to have requested a 30-day extension to make his in forma pauperis petition, though no such request was received by the Court. (Dkt. #20 at 1.)

A motion for reconsideration serves a very limited purpose in federal civil litigation; it should be used only "to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." Rothwell Cotton Co. v. Rosenthal Co., 827 F.2d 246, 251 (7th Cir. 1987) (quoting Keene Corp. v. Int'l Fidelity Ins. Co., 561 F.Supp. 656, 665-66 (N.D.Ill. 1976), aff'd 736 F.2d 388 (7th Cir. 1984)). Such motions are disfavored and should be "rare." Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales, Inc., 906 F.2d 1185, 1191 (7th Cir. 1990).

Broadie has not brought to the Court's attention anything which would justify reconsideration of the order dismissing his case. To the extent his submission of October 6, 2008 was a motion for reconsideration, it will denied as being moot, as his case was dismissed without prejudice.

THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED.


Summaries of

Broadie v. Fagent

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 31, 2008
Case No. 08-C-690 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Broadie v. Fagent

Case Details

Full title:JESUS RAY BROADIE, Plaintiff, v. DR. LINDA FAGENT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Oct 31, 2008

Citations

Case No. 08-C-690 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 31, 2008)