From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brizak v. Margate Tenants Corp.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Nov 13, 2014
DOCKET NO. A-1358-13T2 (App. Div. Nov. 13, 2014)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-1358-13T2

11-13-2014

FRANK BRIZAK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MARGATE TENANTS CORPORATION, Respondent-Respondent.

Capizola, Pancari, Lapham & Fralinger, P.A., attorneys for appellant (Michael D. Capizola, on the brief), Respondent has not filed a brief.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION Before Judges Maven and Carroll. On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce, Division of Workers' Compensation, Case No. 2006-15. Capizola, Pancari, Lapham & Fralinger, P.A., attorneys for appellant (Michael D. Capizola, on the brief), Respondent has not filed a brief. PER CURIAM

Prior to the date scheduled for oral argument, the parties advised us that this matter had been amicably resolved and that a stipulation of dismissal was being prepared. The stipulation of dismissal having been filed, this appeal is dismissed as moot.

Dismissed. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION


Summaries of

Brizak v. Margate Tenants Corp.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION
Nov 13, 2014
DOCKET NO. A-1358-13T2 (App. Div. Nov. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Brizak v. Margate Tenants Corp.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK BRIZAK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MARGATE TENANTS CORPORATION…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 13, 2014

Citations

DOCKET NO. A-1358-13T2 (App. Div. Nov. 13, 2014)