From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 9, 1976
339 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. AA-410.

November 9, 1976. Rehearing Denied December 9, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Columbia County, Alva Duncan, J.

David J. Busch and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant's conviction of robbery must be reversed for the trial court's failure upon request to charge the jury concerning the offense of attempted robbery. Rule 3.510, R.Cr.P.; Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1968). There are no circumstances present which would enable us to treat the error as harmless on authority of Spigner v. State, 304 So.2d 496 (Fla.App.1st, 1974). The federal question raised by the State under the doctrine of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), which if sustained would require partial overruling of Brown and modification of Rule 3.510, R.Cr.P., is more appropriately presented to the Florida Supreme Court.

REVERSED.

RAWLS, Acting C.J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Britton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 9, 1976
339 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Britton v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LEE BRITTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 9, 1976

Citations

339 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

State v. Britton

PER CURIAM. We have for review by certiorari a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District,…