From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brito v. Upton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
May 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv316 (E.D. Tex. May. 21, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv316

05-21-2012

PABLO SALINAS BRITO v. JODY R. UPTON


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pablo Salinas Brito, an inmate confined within the Bureau of Prisons, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge concerning this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends the petition be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Petitioner filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. For the reasons set forth by the Magistrate Judge, the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. O'Brien, _ U.S. _, 130 S.Ct. 2169 (2010), does not provide petitioner with a basis for relief in this proceeding. The Court's decision in O'Brien, which held that the question of whether a firearm is a machine gun is an element of the offense set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(B)(ii), did not decriminalize any of the conduct for which petitioner was convicted. Day v. Tamez, 458 Fed.Appx. 343, 344 (5th Cir. 2012).

ORDER

Accordingly, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered denying the petition.

___________________________

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brito v. Upton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
May 21, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv316 (E.D. Tex. May. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Brito v. Upton

Case Details

Full title:PABLO SALINAS BRITO v. JODY R. UPTON

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv316 (E.D. Tex. May. 21, 2012)