From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brito v. Lucky Seven Rest. & Bar

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 27, 2021
19 Civ. 3876 (PAE) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 2021)

Opinion

19 Civ. 3876 (PAE) (KHP)

12-27-2021

JESUS BRITO, Plaintiff, v. LUCKY SEVEN RESTAURANT &BAR, LLC, D/B/A LUCKY 7 TAPAS BAR, LA CASA DEL MOFONGO INC., FELIX CABRERA, AVI DISHI, AND JOHN DOES #1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, DISTRICT JUDGE:

The Court has received a call from plaintiff's counsel regarding the method by which the parties can correct the deficiencies identified in the Court's order declining to approve the proposed settlement agreement. Dkt. 95. Specifically, plaintiff's counsel inquires whether a consent letter from counsel modifying the language in the agreement will suffice. It will not. The parties bound by the agreement will need to sign off on any language modifying the contract for such language to bind them. Counsel has the discretion to decide whether the form of such modification be an entirely new amended settlement agreement or a rider to the existing one.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brito v. Lucky Seven Rest. & Bar

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 27, 2021
19 Civ. 3876 (PAE) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Brito v. Lucky Seven Rest. & Bar

Case Details

Full title:JESUS BRITO, Plaintiff, v. LUCKY SEVEN RESTAURANT &BAR, LLC, D/B/A LUCKY 7…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 27, 2021

Citations

19 Civ. 3876 (PAE) (KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 2021)