vacating and remanding for further proceedings not inconsistent with Melendez-Diaz
Summary of this case from Symms v. WingardNo. 07–11191.
2009-11-30
Mark A. BRISCOE and Sheldon A. Cypress, petitioners, v. VIRGINIA.
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
vacating and remanding for further proceedings not inconsistent with Melendez-Diaz
Summary of this case from Symms v. WingardFull title:Mark A. BRISCOE and Sheldon A. Cypress, petitioners, v. VIRGINIA.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Nov 30, 2009
Returning to instant case, this Court must first determine whether and to what extent Melendez-Diaz applies…
Copper v. Superintendent of Sci-GreenSee, e.g., Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009) (holding that the admission of certificates of…