From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briones v. Schriro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 12, 2011
No. CV-09-1989-PHX-ROS (JRI) (D. Ariz. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-09-1989-PHX-ROS (JRI)

10-12-2011

Christopher Edward Briones, Plaintiff, v. Dora B. Schriro; et. al., Defendants.


ORDER

On August 17, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Irwin issued a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 67). Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation.

A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.") (internal quotations and citations omitted).

No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 47) is ADOPTED.

IT IS ORDERED Defendant Haley is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to serve.

IT IS ORDERED this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

Roslyn O. SilveK

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Briones v. Schriro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Oct 12, 2011
No. CV-09-1989-PHX-ROS (JRI) (D. Ariz. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Briones v. Schriro

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Edward Briones, Plaintiff, v. Dora B. Schriro; et. al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

No. CV-09-1989-PHX-ROS (JRI) (D. Ariz. Oct. 12, 2011)