From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinton v. Concora Credit Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 22, 2024
3:23-CV-6094 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 22, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-CV-6094

04-22-2024

NATHAN BRINTON, Plaintiff, v. CONCORA CREDIT INC.; JOHN DOES 110, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

WRIGHT, FINLAY, & ZAK, LLP Joseph T. McCormick III, WSBN 48883 Attorney for Concora DIGITAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION Andrew Grimm, WSBA # 51486 Attorney for Plaintiff Nathan Brinton


WRIGHT, FINLAY, & ZAK, LLP Joseph T. McCormick III, WSBN 48883 Attorney for Concora

DIGITAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION Andrew Grimm, WSBA # 51486 Attorney for Plaintiff Nathan Brinton

AGREED ORDER ON STIPULATION TO RESOLVE MOTION TO VOID JUDGMENT AND REMAND

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant, Concora Credit Inc. (“Concora”), and Plaintiff Nathan Brinton (“Brinton”) stipulated for an order to resolve Brinton's Motion to Void Judgment and Remand (ECF # 17) (“Motion”). Having reviewed the stipulation, the Court does hereby ORDER, AJDJUDGE, AND DECREE:

1. The stipulation is GRANTED.

2. The Motion is WITHDRAWN.

3. The Judgment entered on January 8, 2024 (ECF #15), is SET ASIDE.

4. The Order entered on January 8, 2024 (ECF #14), is SET ASIDE as to Plaintiff's claim under Washington's Consumer Protection Act only.

5. Plaintiff's claims for violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §17529.5 and Florida Statute §668.603 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Brinton v. Concora Credit Inc.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 22, 2024
3:23-CV-6094 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Brinton v. Concora Credit Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN BRINTON, Plaintiff, v. CONCORA CREDIT INC.; JOHN DOES 110…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 22, 2024

Citations

3:23-CV-6094 (W.D. Wash. Apr. 22, 2024)