From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinkley v. Dela-Cruz

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 4, 2012
381 P.3d 596 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 61161.

12-04-2012

Burnell Deandre BRINKLEY, individually; and Tasha Jainine Webb, individually, Appellants, v. Divina S. DELA–CRUZ, Individually, Respondent.

David L. Riddle & Associates Fassett & Cardoza


David L. Riddle & Associates

Fassett & Cardoza

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a request for a trial de novo after court-annexed arbitration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gloria Sturman, Judge.

In their timely September 24, 2012, response to this court's order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, appellants agreed that a final judgment has not been entered under NAR 18(F). Appellants asserted that the case had been transferred to a different department and indicated that they would seek a final judgment from that department, but to date, no such judgment has been submitted to this court. Accordingly, as appellants have not demonstrated jurisdiction, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Brinkley v. Dela-Cruz

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Dec 4, 2012
381 P.3d 596 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Brinkley v. Dela-Cruz

Case Details

Full title:Burnell Deandre BRINKLEY, individually; and Tasha Jainine Webb…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Dec 4, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 596 (Nev. 2012)