Opinion
No 522 CA 22-00552
06-09-2023
IN THE MATTER OF BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS, LLC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF BRIGHTON OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 5.)
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (MINDY L. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (MINDY L. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered March 24, 2022, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton [appeal No. 1], __ A.D.3d __ [] [4th Dept 2023]).