Opinion
No. 609 CA 21-01360
09-30-2022
IN THE MATTER OF BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS, LLC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF BRIGHTON OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (MINDY L. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (MINDY L. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered September 21, 2021. The order denied the motion of petitioner for a preliminary injunction.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Brighton Grassroots, LLC v Town of Brighton Planning Bd. ([appeal No. 1] __ A.D.3d __ [Sept. 30, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).