In Bridgman v. Bridgman, 30 W. Va. 212, 3 S.E. 580, two non-resident children were appointed administrators of the estate of decedent by the clerk of the county court more than thirty days after her demise.
Summary of this case from Smith v. HarmerNo. 28613.
July 30, 2009.
Summary Dispositional Orders Vacated and Remanded.
In Bridgman v. Bridgman, 30 W. Va. 212, 3 S.E. 580, two non-resident children were appointed administrators of the estate of decedent by the clerk of the county court more than thirty days after her demise.
Summary of this case from Smith v. HarmerIn Bridgman v. Bridgman, 30 W. Va. 212, this Court recognized the property of the county court's action, as the rightful exercise of its sound discretion, in appointing the sheriff to administer an estate, instead of one or more of several distributees who had applied.
Summary of this case from Brown v. BrownFull title:Bridgman v. Bridgman
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Jul 30, 2009
We think, however, that the provisions of Section 2 and Section 4 must be considered in pari materia for…
Pac. Lime Gypsum Co. v. Mo. Bridge Iron Co.(1) The allegations of the petition, showing partiality on the part of the arbitrator, in themselves warrant…